Cracking Gastric Cancer's Code

How Molecular Profiling and Tiny RNAs Are Revolutionizing Treatment

Molecular Classification miRNA Biomarkers Personalized Medicine

A Story of Hope and Transformation

When Jack, a vibrant New Yorker in his mid-30s, began experiencing difficulty swallowing, he never imagined he'd become part of a revolution in cancer treatment. Diagnosed with gastroesophageal junction cancer where the esophagus meets the stomach, he faced a disease that has long been one of oncology's toughest challenges. "I came to MSK to do my due diligence," Jack recalls. "At my first appointment, I fell in love with the whole team and the facility" 2 .

Jack's story represents both the tragedy and promise of gastric cancer care. For decades, this disease has been notoriously difficult to treat, with limited treatment options and often late-stage detection. But thanks to groundbreaking research into the molecular and genetic fingerprints of gastric cancer, we're witnessing a transformation in how we understand, classify, and treat this disease. New discoveries about microRNAs—tiny genetic regulators that can make or break cancer cells—are opening doors to earlier detection and more personalized treatments that are dramatically improving outcomes for patients like Jack.

Why One Size Doesn't Fit All in Gastric Cancer

For over half a century, doctors classified gastric cancer primarily by how it looked under a microscope. The Lauren classification system, developed in 1965, divided gastric cancer into intestinal (G-INT) and diffuse (G-DIF) types based on their cellular structure and organization 6 . While this system helped doctors predict some aspects of how the cancer might behave, it provided limited guidance for selecting specific treatments.

The critical challenge has been gastric cancer's staggering diversity. What we call "gastric cancer" actually represents multiple different diseases, each with distinct characteristics.

Gastric Cancer Diversity

The Genomic Revolution: Mapping Gastric Cancer's Complex Landscape

The turning point came when research consortia around the world decided to map gastric cancer's molecular landscape in unprecedented detail. Two landmark efforts—The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG)—systematically analyzed hundreds of gastric cancer samples, creating comprehensive molecular portraits that have transformed our understanding of the disease 6 .

The TCGA Classification System

Published in 2013, the TCGA study analyzed 295 gastric cancers using multiple genomic technologies, identifying four distinct molecular subtypes 6 :

Subtype Prevalence Key Characteristics Potential Treatment Approaches
EBV-positive 9% Epstein-Barr virus present, PIK3CA mutations, PD-L1 overexpression Immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors)
Microsatellite Unstable (MSI) 22% High mutation rates, DNA methylation Immunotherapy
Genomically Stable (GS) 20% Diffuse histology, CDH1 mutations Targeted therapies
Chromosomally Unstable (CIN) 50% Tumor protein p53 (TP53) mutations, receptor tyrosine kinase activation Chemotherapy, targeted therapies

The ACRG Classification System

The ACRG classification, developed similarly through multi-platform molecular analysis, identified four subtypes with distinct clinical outcomes 6 :

MSI Subtype

Best prognosis, often found in older patients

85% Survival
MSS/EMT Subtype

Worst prognosis, frequently seen in younger patients with diffuse-type cancer

45% Survival
MSS/TP53+ Subtype

Intermediate prognosis

65% Survival
MSS/TP53- Subtype

Intermediate prognosis

60% Survival

miRNAs: The Tiny Game-Changers in Gastric Cancer

While the TCGA and ACRG classifications represented massive steps forward, scientists discovered that some of the most exciting biomarkers were among the smallest—microRNAs (miRNAs). These tiny RNA molecules, only about 22 nucleotides long, don't code for proteins but instead fine-tune gene expression by binding to messenger RNAs and preventing their translation into proteins .

miRNAs as Master Regulators

In gastric cancer, specific miRNAs function as either oncomiRNAs that drive cancer growth or tumor suppressor miRNAs that protect against it 3 . For example:

miR-21-5p

Acts as an oncomiRNA, promoting tumor growth and spread

miR-145-5p

Serves as a tumor suppressor, with its downregulation linked to worse outcomes

miR-29b-3p

Helps regulate cancer cell proliferation and invasion 3 5

Performance of miRNA Panels in Cancer Detection

miRNA Panel Target Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Key miRNAs Included
Multi-Cancer Panel 13 cancer types 96.1% 98.6% 96% hsa-miR-8073, hsa-miR-614, hsa-miR-548ah-5p, hsa-miR-1258
Gastric Cancer Panel Gastric cancer only 87% 89% 90% hsa-miR-1228-5p, hsa-miR-1343-3p, hsa-miR-6765-5p, hsa-miR-6787-5p

miRNA Expression and Its Clinical Implications in Gastric Cancer

miRNA Expression in Gastric Cancer Role Clinical Significance Impact on Survival
miR-21-5p Upregulated OncomiRNA Predicts lymph node metastasis, advanced stage Reduced 3-year survival
miR-145-5p Downregulated Tumor suppressor Predicts lymph node metastasis, improved outcome Improved 3-year survival
miR-382-5p Variable Angiogenesis Associated with non-mucinous carcinoma type Under investigation

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Tools for miRNA Research

The remarkable progress in miRNA research has been powered by sophisticated laboratory tools and technologies :

Tool/Reagent Function Application in miRNA Research
Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) High-throughput RNA sequencing Comprehensive miRNA profiling, discovery of novel miRNAs
RT-qPCR (Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR) Precise quantification of specific miRNAs Validation of miRNA expression, diagnostic testing
Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) Probes Modified nucleotides for enhanced binding Improved detection sensitivity in northern blotting
Microarrays Simultaneous measurement of hundreds of miRNAs miRNA expression profiling, biomarker identification
RNA Isolation Kits Purification of high-quality miRNA from samples Preparation of samples for downstream analysis
Multiclass SVM Algorithms Machine learning classification Categorizing miRNAs into families, identifying patterns

The Future: Earlier Detection and Personalized Treatments

The impact of molecular classification extends beyond treatment selection. We're seeing a quiet revolution in early detection 7 . Between 2004 and 2021, diagnoses of early-stage stomach cancer rose by approximately 53%, while advanced cases dropped significantly. In 2021, for the first time, early-stage gastric cancer became the most common stage at diagnosis 7 .

Early vs Advanced Stage Diagnosis Trend
Future Directions in Gastric Cancer Care
Identify ever-more-specific patient subgroups

Refining molecular classifications to target therapies more precisely

Match each patient with optimally targeted therapies

Using biomarkers to personalize treatment regimens

Monitor treatment response through liquid biopsies

Non-invasive monitoring using circulating miRNAs

Intercept cancer development at its earliest stages

Early detection strategies to improve survival rates

Conclusion: A New Era of Hope

The journey from the Lauren classification to molecular subtyping and miRNA profiling represents one of the most exciting transformations in modern oncology. We've moved from viewing gastric cancer as a single entity to recognizing it as multiple distinct diseases, each with its own molecular signature and treatment vulnerabilities.

The discovery that tiny miRNAs can serve as powerful biomarkers and therapeutic targets highlights how science's smallest discoveries can make the biggest differences in patients' lives. As research continues, the dream of turning gastric cancer from a deadly disease into a manageable condition is becoming increasingly tangible.

"At MSK, you can see the compassion and the dedication to treating cancer. I tell people you don't go to a fruit store for steaks. Treating cancer is MSK's business. This is what they do. And they are the best at it." 2

References